Login | Live Chat | Contact | Support (888) 200-9494
HOME » BLOG » Technology » Cloud DR or DR for cloud?

Cloud DR or DR for cloud?

January 24th, 2010 by Jon Greaves
Tags: Cloud Computing, Disaster Recovery

Over the past couple of months we have seen tremendous interest in using cloud for disaster recovery solutions. Some of this has been fueled by CIO’s looking for a more cost-effective method of DR from traditional cold/warm/hot sites and others from cloud customers who have been impacted by some of the outages of late at Rackspace and Amazon.

 

If we pull back the hype, cloud is really a virtualized platform running in a geography (i.e., datacenter, availability zone, location, region…).  Most of the more mature cloud providers have multiple cloud pops with some form of interconnect.  For Carpathia Hosting, our cloud pops are northern Virginia and Arizona.  Within a geography, cloud technology affords a great degree of resiliency to component failure, but lose the geography due to something catastrophic - whether it be natural disasters, facility infrastructure failures or sys-admin “oops” – at which point, cloud is much like any kind of hosting solution.  Offline .   Resiliency does != DR.

 

People who have adopted the cloud gain a lot of technology advantages that help them solve the issue of portability between cloud pops.  In addition, as standards emerge between cloud providers, it will become that much more straightforward to have a copy of the “application” in a remote location.  With today’s cloud platforms this isn’t automatic.  Although great improvements have been made in the past six months, the technology still isn’t there.

 

So cloud hosting customers should consider DR in exactly the same way a traditionally-hosted infrastructure does — build a plan, test a plan, re-test a plan.  Simply being in the cloud (at least today’s versions) doesn’t provide a DR solution.

 

So how does Carpathia Hosting position cloud DR?  We have an approach that takes advantage of the per CPU hour/per GB to allow customers to:

  • Replicate data from production to a remote cloud    nstance (i.e., data can be hosted on dedicated infrastructure or cloud/virtualized).
  • Host golden images of “servers” in our cloud template library.
  • Build an “application group” that can instantiate virtual servers, virtual firewalls, virtual load balancers, etc. with one click from the golden images tied to replicated data.  Application groups understand private networking/vlans, security policy, meta data about servers.  Everything to re-create an infrastructure.
  • Deliver as a managed service, customer picks up the “bat phone” and calls a DR event.  We put the plan in place to meet your recovery time objectives.
  • Tests with the customer every six months (or whatever the policy is), record results, iterate plan, etc..
  • Pay for server resources when you use them (twice a year in DR test and in a real DR).
  • Deliver bandwidth in a very cost-effective way, not  “bytes transferred”.

 

This kind of cloud DR solution costs about 25% of a traditional warm DR site.  Since data replication takes place in real time, recover point objectives can be very aggressive (and your data is offsite by default).

 

If you would like to learn more, drop me a note or send an email to sales@carpathia.com.

Write a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

If you have trouble reading the code, click on the code itself to generate a new random code.
 
qquwop
Posts: 4
Comment
jexxFjRIjToJwaYEh
Reply #4 on : Thu March 15, 2012, 17:24:56
F6VqKE , [url=http://gygtcngpsacw.com/]gygtcngpsacw[/url], [link=http://cdgutozdfbfb.com/]cdgutozdfbfb[/link], http://rxiwvhzhcgrx.com/
Ivonne
Posts: 4
Comment
PBIbPOLhVghMsSjfKu
Reply #3 on : Thu March 15, 2012, 00:31:56
You're right, Anthony more and more software depelovers are opting for sync via the cloud, because syncing between computers through dedicated sync apps is such a huge pain, and is often unreliable. I recall how frustrated I used to get trying to keep my work computer in sync with my Pocket PC and home computer. (Once we went to Exchange Server, it got better, but sure was frustrating for a long while.) And the situation would be even worse today, with all the specialized apps, if not for the option of the cloud.Going to paper is something I'm seriously considering, too. I just spent the morning dealing with a hack on my testserver turns out that one of the site designs I had paid for had been hacked on the developer's server, and I inherited the hack when I downloaded an update from him. What a huge pain in the butt, and another reminder to me to limit make sure my cloud dealings are only with organizations that really know what they are doing and that have security staffs to deal with such issues.Thank you for the comment,Bruce
Reagan
Posts: 4
Comment
ssiTgcPGIjWkPftKGw
Reply #2 on : Thu March 08, 2012, 10:15:43
say I currently have a Dedicated Server that hosts small scioal networks (i.e.: salsahook[dot]com) and other database-driven (sql) websites. What is a price comparison that I can get and/or are there any benefits for a small fish like me? Is private cloud hosting for someone like me or for a larger customer that runs very large websites? I will appreciate a response.
Gary Shannon
Posts: 4
Comment
Cloud D.R. Solution
Reply #1 on : Mon November 28, 2011, 10:21:23
Hello,

This sounds like something that we would be interested. We have a virtual environment and need to setup a DR site in the cloud soomewhere. We have an Equalogic SAN and can setup replication to keep our data up to date, and we like the idea of paying for what we use, and then having the environment off until we need it.I would like to learn more about how we can accomplish what we need.

Thanks!

[ Authors ]

[ Categories ]

[ Archives ]

Archives

engage
twitter facebook linkedin
connect
facebook share twitter share linkedin stumble digg delicious reddit mail